1. Yet ,, when you look at the genealogy and family history, each of us knowthat for every single signal there is an exception. An effective vexing point ofgenealogy is the fact no one really knows just how to utilize new exceptions orrules with people decisive adjective such as for example usually, possibly, probably,most likely, etc. It would be fascinating in the event that around most other examples ofjointures becoming produced per year or a few immediately after a well-known wedding date.
2. Will there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards the relationship from ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who have been 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or next cousins, immediately following taken from the newest 5th LordClifford? Who narrow down the marriage date.
Arthur
Presumably, in the event that a good dispensation was sought and offered, it might havebeen of the one of the after the, that will appear in this new correspondingregister guide, when it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out-of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop from Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Should your 10th Lord Clifford does wed during the early 1487 [say January] andhas Elizabeth after in this season, do the chronology maybe not works?
John palms?
Elizabeth produced during the later 1487, Henry produced inside 1488/nine, Joan when you look at the ,etcetera. filling out the brand new names of your post from . When the (a) thechronology nonetheless work; and you can (b) her relationship piece wasn’t lower; thenwe just have new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s that’s from inside the oppositionto the newest supposition one she are a valid child.
6. About your 1505 pedigree: Are the Clifford daughters brand new onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Were there anybody else? In this case,would not you to echo defectively with this file once the a resource?
Regarding reviews We have made of the fresh c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith the brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of your Northern pedigrees, which happen to be
On the c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, the fresh new Clifford youngsters are perhaps not kan jag gifta mig med en Dominikansk kvinna pГҐ mitt besГ¶k i Dominikanska? listedin good Clifford pedigree, but rather from the St. John pedigree. Since I’mnot familiar with the newest St. John relatives, following the is the guidance asit appears throughout the c.1505 pedigree, as taken from the fresh 1834 Coll. Top. etGen. article. The newest phrasing when you look at the quotations is strictly because it seems inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Regarding my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess off Somerset had about three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Woman new King’s Mother.” that has “The fresh Queen.” whohad “Prince “Of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first partner.” she had step three daus & 2 sons:
Good. “Edith, wedded to Geoffrey Pole of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded for the Lady Margaret, dau. off theDuke away from Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[a different child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had five youngsters:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Four daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. off Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun regarding Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded in order to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you will sistren.” Which have issueindicated, but not called.C2. “Elizabeth, married so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, married basic into the Lord Zouche; just after on LordScrope off Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated but not named.
Margaret Duchess from Somerset, because of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. from K. Edward IV.” andthey got “E.”