I and observed conceptual resemblances between your Filipino dimensions to possess personal roles and you may consequences and many of Goldberg’s (1982) conceptually-derived categories for societal jobs, dating, and you will consequences on the English language. In particular, Filipino Prominence generally seems to include terminology from inside the Goldberg’s Fame, Determine, Popularity, and you may Importance categories. Filipino Uselessness (inversely) is similar to Goldberg’s Competence category. Intimate conceptual correspondences also are obvious between Filipino Attractiveness and you can Goldberg’s Appeal, and you can anywhere between Filipino Respectability and you will Goldberg’s Respect. Filipino Charm appears to involve the majority of Goldberg’s Attention, Charm, and you will Entertainment-worth kinds, and lots of terms and conditions for the Goldberg’s Attention classification including convergence with Filipino Uniqueness. Filipino Dangerousness is similar to Goldberg’s Popularity, Fearsomeness, and you will Antagonism groups, and you will Filipino Destructiveness as well as overlaps having Goldberg’s Antagonism. Of course, several Filipino proportions which might be discussed primarily from the real trait terms, Fuel and Presentableness, do not appear to correspond closely to almost any from Goldberg’s categories of public spots and you may effects (even if Goldberg’s https://datingmentor.org/cs/randeni-nad-60-let/ Styles group boasts “presentable” while the a phrase). We want to remember that we did not try to build marker balances having Goldberg’s (1982) abstract groups in addition to their care about-declaration framework throughout the English words was not familiar. Overall, yet not, the abstract research means that there’s a good deal of cross-cultural similarity in the biggest kinds of social jobs and you can outcomes, which some of Goldberg’s a lot more understated abstract categories you’ll merge on wider size into the mind-declaration investigation.
Numerous Goldberg’s less kinds, and additionally Nurturance, Succorance, Changes, Clarity, Responsibility, Forgivability, Manner, Politics, Intercourse, and you can Faith do not showcase much abstract resemblance to your Filipino size of societal and you may actual characteristics
Playing with shared part and regression analyses, i indicated that all of the societal and you can real characteristic size was in fact sparingly in order to relevant to one or more Filipino characteristic and evaluative size. The fresh new clearest exception try the little Presentableness measurement. Regardless of the character-advantages judgments of our own Filipino informants, the fresh new Presentableness dimension, that has been comprised of physical appearance properties (elizabeth.grams., presentable, brush against. dirty), may possibly provide reduced facts about character versus most other public and you can bodily attribute dimensions. On top of that, brand new Stature and you can Elegance proportions-more another social and you may bodily characteristic proportions-frequently address properties which can be fairly type of conceptually on the Filipino characteristic and you may evaluative proportions.
The fresh new correlations found anywhere between all public proportions while the characteristic feature size advise that conditions having personal spots, statuses, and you can effects will get mirror social consequences of variety of character traits. In reality, Angleitner mais aussi al. (1990) recommended you to definitely personal positions and you can statuses echo the new perception that faculties keeps to your others. Particularly, Filipinos that have Gregariousness faculties are likely to be revealed of the by themselves although some in terms of the societal functions define the Charisma dimensions (age.grams., grounds glee otherwise joy). Similarly, Filipinos with Conscientiousness faculties are likely to be explained inside the terms of Respectability personal properties (e.g., respected, honorable). These you’ll be able to backlinks between characteristics and you may societal reputations is checked-out in direct coming research because of the correlating notice-critiques towards attribute proportions which have observer studies with the personal and you can bodily characteristic size.
Particularly, because of the dating regarding mind-thought elegance in order to personal really-being (Diener, Wolsic, & Fujita, 1995), and body visualize so you’re able to one another notice-regard and you will eating disorders (Mintz & Betz, 1988), new Elegance dimensions could provide an important introduction inside the systematic testing
A practiced implication in our results is the fact not too much was forgotten by the determining precisely the Filipino trait and evaluative proportions. Actually, considering the consequence of the fresh combined component analysis ( Dining table 2 ), specific words having personal and you can physical features could even be additional so you can existing trait and evaluative scales. Although not, if an individual were to incorporate most size, outside the feature and you can evaluative size, the most appropriate candidates could well be Prominence and you may Elegance. The newest Prominence measure perform determine mind-detected social status or status, because the Elegance scale create determine mind-understood physical elegance and you will appeal.